Galaxy S9+ vs Pixel 2 XL Camera > Low Light, Selfie Camera, Video Capture

Low Light, Selfie Camera, Video Capture

Low Light

This indoor low light photo is brighter and less grainy captured on the Galaxy S9+, with better depth of field, more natural still still saturated colors, and similar detail to the Pixel 2 40 image. The Pixel 2 Twoscore image is improve exposed, though at that place is noticeable grain even when downscaled, and the slight yellow tone is oddly unnatural and different to the colder tones we've seen in other images taken by the Pixel

However, in a darker indoor environment, the Pixel ii XL delivers a conspicuously superior photo when detail is required. The Milky way S9+ image is devoid of fine detail in many areas, creating almost a blurry issue on the fabric. In contrast, the Pixel 2 Xl image is more highly detailed at the expense of slightly more grain. Besides, it'south worth mentioning the colors on the Pixel 2 XL paradigm are more vibrant and more than authentic, while the Galaxy S9 photo looks washed out to an extent.

The Galaxy S9+ does have an advantage, however, in most pitch blackness conditions. The higher up image is actually visible with the Galaxy S9, while the Pixel ii XL'south capture is basically useless. The Milky way S9 photo isn't particularly accurate, yet if you need a 'brighter than existent life' photo, it is capable of it.

Selfie Camera

Looking at the selfie cameras, it's articulate the Google Pixel 2 Forty has a far superior front end facing camera that delivers ameliorate results in a range of weather condition.

While both front facing cameras are viii-megapixels, the Pixel two camera captures significantly more detail, which is seen in both my skin texture and beard. The Galaxy S9+ paradigm is brighter, however the result is very soft and lacks skin detail, and that's with Samsung'southward beauty feature disabled. There'southward slightly meliorate bokeh with the Galaxy S9+ selfie from the wider lens, but the difference is negligible and I far prefer the greater depth provided with the Pixel ii selfie camera.

It's a like story in low light. Fifty-fifty though the Pixel 2 XL's camera uses i.4µm pixels with an f/2.4 lens, and the Galaxy S9+ has i.22µm pixels with an f/1.7 lens, the Pixel 2 40'southward low light selfies are captured with more depth, more accurate colors and more than particular. The Milky way S9's low lite selfies are somewhat brighter and less grainy, but devoid of all detail and depth

Video Capture

Both the Milky way S9+ and Pixel two XL are capable of 4K video capture and slow motion capture, yet the quality produced by the two phones does differ significantly.

In terms of color quality, saturation, accuracy, white residual, exposure, dynamic range, contrast and color depth, what you get is very similar to the however photos produced by both phones, so I won't cover that aspect again. Instead I'll look at simply the video-specific aspects.

When recording at 4K, detail is i of the primal components. If there is not enough detail in the 4K prototype, you lot may as well record at 1080p and save yourself some storage space. When it comes to the Galaxy S9+'s 4K recordings, there is a astringent lack of fine detail – worse than with the still images – such that grass, rocks, wood and whatever other detailed objects in broad shots will exist devoid of detail and a blurry, smudged mess.

The Pixel ii Twoscore isn't exactly a fantastic performer with 4K video detail, notwithstanding like with still images, information technology again has a handy pb on the Galaxy S9 in this department. Where the Galaxy S9+'south 4K capture looks like 1080p at best, the Pixel two Forty does provide a bit of actress detail at 4K. In fact when downscaling both results to 1080p, there is noticeably more fine detail in the Pixel 2 XL's videos, while the Galaxy S9+ is still unimpressive fifty-fifty when downscaled.

The Pixel two XL is likewise faster at both exposure changes and focusing, and its video stabilization is superior with greater milk shake reduction, fewer artefacts and smooth panning. The Galaxy S9+'s stabilization is good, though in that location are stutters at times, particularly while panning. I also noticed some weird panning artefacts with the Galaxy S9+ capture that weren't nowadays on the Pixel two Twoscore capture, while conversely, the Pixel 2 XL did have a few more than compression artefacts in its result.

In general, though, information technology's no competition: the Pixel 2 40's 4K capture is far superior. It also uses roughly the same bitrate, 46 to 48 Mbps, and I experience an increase to 60 Mbps would deliver even ameliorate quality with the Pixel 2 XL while the same alter wouldn't make a meaning difference to the Galaxy S9+'s image quality.

The Milky way S9+ does take an advantage in that information technology can capture 4K 60 FPS video, whereas the Pixel 2 XL is limited to just 30 FPS. You lose image stabilization at 4K sixty FPS, which is a cardinal downside, however the boosted frame rate could be handy. That said, considering the fine detail quality, there isn't much difference between the Galaxy S9+'s 4K 60FPS capture, and the Pixel 2 Forty'south 1080p lx FPS.

Where the Galaxy S9+ stands out is in its 960 FPS slow motion video capture at 720p. The Pixel two Forty can only manage 240 FPS at this resolution, which is still expert by smartphone standards, but not a patch on 960 FPS.

There actually is no contest here: the extra frame rate of the Galaxy S9+ capture produces far more compelling results. There isn't much else to say here; if you want the best slow motion capture out of these two devices, get the Galaxy S9+.

Extra Features

In addition to the master photo and video modes, both the Pixel ii Xl and Galaxy S9+ take some additional modes that are worth discussing. I'm not going to go through every single pick these cameras have, instead focusing on the key items.

To showtime with, both phones include a 'portrait' mode that attempts to simulate shallow depth of field. In the case of the Pixel two XL with a single camera, information technology attempts to increment the background mistiness around a focused object through software algorithms and border detection. The Galaxy S9+ has a secondary photographic camera, so information technology captures a depth map to assist the algorithms and edge detection to innovate this background blur consequence.

I tend to detect portrait modes extremely hit or miss, with weather heavily influencing how the epitome turns out. Most cameras practice a pretty good chore when things are simple, but with a complex subject, similar this potted plant, the best border detection and depth algorithms come in to play.

Here the Galaxy S9+ does a poor job of proper depth mapping and edge detection, with obvious and quite jarring areas that are incorrectly blurred. The full general blur effect is quite pleasing but the transition in some areas from sharp to mistiness is a bit strange. The Pixel 2 Twoscore paradigm has much better edge detection and better depth sensing – which is surprising every bit information technology only has one camera and no true depth data – even so there are still some areas incorrectly blurred.

In general the Pixel 2 XL image is better here and this was also the example throughout other portrait mode tests. Not merely was the image quality better, the Pixel 2 allows you lot to use the mode in a much wider range of conditions, including in macro scenarios. The Galaxy S9+'s mode will not function if you are too close or too far away from the subject area, which is frustrating at times.

The issues I mentioned earlier carry over to the portrait selfie mode. Here the Galaxy S9 actually does a reasonable job, however it still incorrectly blurs some areas of my face, particularly my hair, and hasn't performed as well as I'd like in edge detection. The Pixel 2 XL delivers a much sharper result with better edge detection, though again the depth mapping is not perfect and in that location are some areas with artefacts.

Both the Pixel 2 XL and Galaxy S9+ accept some augmented reality effects. The Pixel ii XL allows you to place objects into a scene through its AR Stickers feature, which works actually well. The Milky way S9+ has AR Emojis, which scan your face to create a cartoon 3D representation that responds to your facial expressions. AR Emojis are neat and a clear rip-off of Apple tree's Animoji characteristic, though it'due south non a particularly useful improver and falls into the uncanny valley at times. In fact no AR camera features are ever peculiarly useful aside from a few fun experiments.

One clear advantage the Milky way S9+ camera has is a proper manual mode, whereas on the Pixel 2 40 camera you are stuck with simply an auto manner complemented by a few pocket-size settings you tin change. The Galaxy S9+ allows you to change aperture, white balance, exposure, shutter speed, ISO and more in its manual mode, so y'all can smash the exact shot you are later on. I wish these settings were bachelor on the Pixel 2 XL photographic camera, outside of a third-party application.

Final Thoughts

Beyond all the side-by-side photos we captured with the Samsung Galaxy S9+ and the Google Pixel 2 Xl, there are some clear areas where each phone succeeds. At that place are a lot of comparisons in this article targeting varied shooting weather condition, and later a lot of time testing both phones, information technology's articulate to me which provides a superior camera experience.

It's the Pixel 2 XL.

But the battle is shut. In virtually situations, the images you get from either telephone are fantastic, and it tin can be hard to split the difference without nit-picking. However, in some cardinal areas, the Pixel 2 Forty pulls ahead in terms of prototype quality, and that's why information technology retains the pinnacle mobile smartphone camera crown.

The Pixel 2 Xl camera is improve at exposing images, produces photos with college detail and color depth, and deals with high-contrast environments in a superior manner. Color remainder isn't quite every bit good as the Galaxy S9+ in some situations, merely the Pixel two Xl delivers like levels of saturation without losing nuance.

There are other areas where the Pixel 2 Twoscore stands out. It captures images faster and with less motion mistiness, which is key for capturing fast-moving objects. In low calorie-free you can become brighter, less noisy images with the Milky way S9+, but the Pixel 2 XL delivers more than item and amend colors in low calorie-free situations. The Galaxy S9+'s f/1.5 discontinuity mode does deliver slightly improve bokeh, but the Pixel ii XL gets shut with f/1.8 and overall I don't think the dual discontinuity camera is a pregnant reward.

The selfie camera is universally better on the Pixel ii Forty, including color performance, particular, and low light performance. This is too the case with 4K video capture: the Galaxy S9+'south 4K capture lacks the particular of true 4K and ends upward looking like upscaled 1080p, while the Pixel 2 XL packs more item into the aforementioned bitrate. On pinnacle of this, the Pixel 2 Forty features better image stabilization, fewer artefacts in motion, and faster adjustments to exposure and focus.

However, it'due south not a slam dunk win to the Pixel 2 Twoscore. Several shots we captured across a variety of atmospheric condition did look meliorate on the Milky way S9+, and the 'commencement glance' appearance of many photos is very good. The Galaxy S9+ besides includes a 2x zoom camera, which the Pixel 2 XL does not, and in the case of this smartphone, the secondary zoom camera does provide significantly more than particular for zoomed images than a simple digital zoom of the primary camera.

While the Pixel 2 Forty has a better portrait way for the front and rear cameras, I don't think either implementation is rock solid just yet. The Galaxy S9+ also packs much better slow motion capture, at 960 FPS versus 240 FPS on the Pixel, and includes a proper manual mode for fine adjustments on the go. To become a manual mode on the Pixel two 40, yous'll need to download a third-party application.

All upwardly, though, I'd choose the Pixel ii Twoscore over the Galaxy S9+ every bit the all-time smartphone camera, yet I wouldn't be disappointed with the Galaxy S9+: information technology puts up a keen fight and shouldn't disappoint buyers after a dependable phone camera.

Shopping Shortcuts: